e2b vs appsmith
Two of the top projects in App builder starters, side by side: who leads on each score part and who each one suits, then setup, license, activity and what each review found.
e2b
SDKs for running AI-generated code in isolated cloud sandboxes
appsmith
Low-code builder for internal dashboards and admin panels on your own data
Verdict
e2b ranks higher, 83 to 82. Of the 4 score parts we measure for both, e2b leads on 2, appsmith on 1 and 1 is even.
- Adoptionappsmith leads by 20 points, 94 to 74: a wide gap.
- FreshnessEven at 100.
- Maintenancee2b leads by 1 point, 80 to 79: close to even.
- Agent-readye2b leads by 70 points, 70 to 0: a wide gap.
Pick e2b if you are
Developers who need sandboxed code execution for agents or app builders
- Official JavaScript/TypeScript and Python SDKs with a matching sandbox API
- Separate Code Interpreter and Desktop SDKs cover code execution and computer use
Pick appsmith if you are
Teams building internal dashboards and admin tools with low-code
- Self-host via Docker, Kubernetes or AWS AMI, with a hosted Cloud option
- Apache-2.0 licensed, TypeScript codebase with frequent releases (latest 2026-10-21)
| What we compare | e2b | appsmith |
|---|---|---|
| Score parts, out of 100 | ||
| Adoption | 74, popular | 94, widely used |
| Freshness | 100, active | 100, active |
| Maintenance | 80, healthy | 79, fair |
| Agent-ready | 70, partly | 0, none |
| Facts from GitHub and the README | ||
| Stars | 14.8k | 41.2k |
| License | Apache-2.0 (permissive) | Apache-2.0 (permissive) |
| Last commit | Nov 2026 | Nov 2026 |
| Last release | Nov 2026 | Oct 2026 |
| Language | Python | TypeScript |
| Docker | Yes | Yes |
| GPU | Not stated | Not needed |
| arm64 or Apple Silicon | Not stated | Not stated |
e2b
E2B provides JavaScript and Python SDKs that start isolated cloud sandboxes and run shell commands inside them. Companion packages add a Code Interpreter (runCode/run_code) and a Desktop SDK for mouse, keyboard and screenshot control. The runtime can be self-hosted with Terraform on AWS, GCP, Azure or a generic Linux machine; the hosted service needs an API key.
Who it is for: Developers who need sandboxed code execution for agents or app builders
Strengths
- Official JavaScript/TypeScript and Python SDKs with a matching sandbox API
- Separate Code Interpreter and Desktop SDKs cover code execution and computer use
- Self-hosting supported on AWS, GCP, Azure and generic Linux via Terraform
- Apache-2.0 license; cookbook repo has examples for several LLMs and frameworks
Weaknesses
- Hosted use requires an E2B account and API key
- Self-hosted runtime lives in a separate repo, e2b-dev/runtime
- README gives no resource requirements, pricing or sandbox limits
- Provides sandboxes only; agent logic and LLM integration are left to you
- Python
- Needs E2B API key (hosted), Terraform (self-hosting)
- Docker
appsmith
Appsmith is a low-code platform for building internal tools such as dashboards, admin panels and customer 360 views, then deploying and maintaining them. It can be self-hosted or used through Appsmith Cloud. The README also promotes a separate product, Appsmith Agents, which adds AI models over private data; its availability and licensing in this repo are not stated.
Who it is for: Teams building internal dashboards and admin tools with low-code
Strengths
- Self-host via Docker, Kubernetes or AWS AMI, with a hosted Cloud option
- Apache-2.0 licensed, TypeScript codebase with frequent releases (latest 2026-10-21)
- Documentation, tutorials and templates are linked from the README
- Targets internal tools like admin panels and dashboards rather than generic apps
Weaknesses
- Not a prompt-to-app builder; AI features sit in the separate Agents product
- Appsmith Agents is only described as a product pitch; open-source status unclear
- No docker-compose file detected in the repo
- TypeScript
- Docker
- env example file
More in App builder starters
Building with these?
We help teams pick an open-source AI stack and run it in production. Client work never changes a rank.