openai-agents-python vs haystack

Two of the top projects in Agent frameworks and SDKs, side by side: who leads on each score part and who each one suits, then setup, license, activity and what each review found.

22nd of 142 in Agent frameworks and SDKs

openai-agents-python

Python SDK for multi-agent workflows with handoffs, guardrails and tracing

#88th of 142 in Agent frameworks and SDKs

haystack

Python framework for building RAG pipelines and agents from modular components

Verdict

openai-agents-python ranks higher, 92 to 89. Of the 4 score parts we measure for both, openai-agents-python leads on 2, haystack on none and 2 are even.

  • Adoptionopenai-agents-python leads by 4 points, 86 to 82: close to even.
  • FreshnessEven at 100.
  • Maintenanceopenai-agents-python leads by 4 points, 97 to 93: close to even.
  • Agent-readyEven at 70.

Pick openai-agents-python if you are

Python developers building tool-using or multi-agent LLM apps

  • Small API: Agent and Runner cover a text agent in a few lines
  • Tools can be Python functions, MCP servers or hosted tools

Pick haystack if you are

Python developers building production RAG systems and agents

  • Pipelines support loops, branches and conditional routing, so context flow is explicit and traceable
  • Agent hooks (before_llm, before_tool, on_exit) plus step_count and token_usage tracking
openai-agents-python vs haystack: score parts and facts
What we compareopenai-agents-pythonhaystack
Score parts, out of 100
Adoption86, widely used82, widely used
Freshness100, active100, active
Maintenance97, healthy93, healthy
Agent-ready70, partly70, partly
Facts from GitHub and the README
Stars30.6k27k
LicenseMIT (permissive)Apache-2.0 (permissive)
Last commitNov 2026Nov 2026
Last releaseOct 2026Nov 2026
LanguagePythonPython
DockerNoYes
GPUNot neededOptional
arm64 or Apple SiliconNot statedNot stated

openai-agents-python

Python library from OpenAI for building agents with instructions, tools, guardrails and handoffs between agents. It supports the OpenAI Responses and Chat Completions APIs and, per the README, 100+ other LLMs. It also includes sandbox agents, realtime and voice agents, sessions for conversation history, human-in-the-loop controls and built-in tracing.

Who it is for: Python developers building tool-using or multi-agent LLM apps

Strengths

  • Small API: Agent and Runner cover a text agent in a few lines
  • Tools can be Python functions, MCP servers or hosted tools
  • Built-in tracing, guardrails, sessions and human-in-the-loop support
  • Includes sandbox, realtime and voice agents; MIT license, Python 3.10+

Weaknesses

  • Examples assume OPENAI_API_KEY; non-OpenAI models go through optional LiteLLM or any-llm
  • Pull requests limited to repository collaborators
  • Python only; JS/TS version is a separate repository
  • Realtime agents use gpt-realtime-2.1, an OpenAI-hosted model
  • no GPU
  • Needs OpenAI API key, Python 3.10+, optional: Redis, optional: SQLAlchemy, optional: websockets, optional: LiteLLM or any-llm, optional: Docker
  • Models: OpenAI Responses API, OpenAI Chat Completions API, 100+ other LLMs via LiteLLM or any-llm

haystack

Haystack is a Python framework for composing LLM applications as pipelines of components covering retrieval, routing, memory, tool calling and generation. One Pipeline runs sync or async and streams tokens, and the Agent class supports lifecycle hooks and concurrent tool calls. It integrates with OpenAI, Anthropic, Mistral, Cohere, Hugging Face, Google, Azure OpenAI, AWS Bedrock and local models.

Who it is for: Python developers building production RAG systems and agents

Strengths

  • Pipelines support loops, branches and conditional routing, so context flow is explicit and traceable
  • Agent hooks (before_llm, before_tool, on_exit) plus step_count and token_usage tracking
  • Model-agnostic: many hosted providers and local models, swappable without rewriting pipelines
  • Installs with pip install haystack-ai; Apache-2.0 licensed

Weaknesses

  • Collects anonymous component-usage telemetry by default; opt-out is documented separately
  • Serving as REST or MCP needs the separate Hayhooks project
  • Governance, access controls and managed observability are in the paid Enterprise Platform
  • Many integrations live in a separate haystack-core-integrations repo
  • GPU optional
  • Docker
  • Needs Python, LLM provider or local model
  • Models: OpenAI, Anthropic, Mistral, Cohere, Hugging Face

More in Agent frameworks and SDKs

Building with these?

We help teams pick an open-source AI stack and run it in production. Client work never changes a rank.