dotnet-starter-kit vs next-forge

Two of the top projects in SaaS boilerplates, side by side: who leads on each score part and who each one suits, then setup, license, activity and what each review found.

11st of 14 in SaaS boilerplates

dotnet-starter-kit

.NET 10 multi-tenant SaaS starter with two React 19 front-ends

33rd of 14 in SaaS boilerplates

next-forge

Turborepo monorepo template for SaaS apps built on Next.js

Verdict

dotnet-starter-kit ranks higher, 78 to 70. Of the 4 score parts we measure for both, dotnet-starter-kit leads on 2, next-forge on 1 and 1 is even.

  • Adoptionnext-forge leads by 11 points, 40 to 29.
  • Freshnessdotnet-starter-kit leads by 15 points, 100 to 85: a wide gap.
  • Easy to runEven at 100.
  • Agent-readydotnet-starter-kit leads by 70 points, 70 to 0: a wide gap.

Pick dotnet-starter-kit if you are

.NET teams building a multi-tenant SaaS who want owned source

  • Full source scaffolded with project references, no hidden runtime NuGet packages
  • Multitenancy, JWT/Identity auth, billing, auditing and webhooks already wired in

Pick next-forge if you are

Teams starting a Next.js SaaS who want an integrated monorepo stack

  • Auth, payments, email, analytics, observability and security packages are pre-wired in one monorepo
  • Each app is independently deployable; packages are shared across apps
dotnet-starter-kit vs next-forge: score parts and facts
What we comparedotnet-starter-kitnext-forge
Score parts, out of 100
Adoption29, niche40, known
Freshness100, active85, active
MaintenanceNot scored for this kindNot scored for this kind
Easy to run100, very easy100, very easy
Agent-ready70, partly0, none
Facts from GitHub and the README
Stars6.8k7.7k
LicenseMIT (permissive)MIT (permissive)
Last commitSep 2026May 2026
Last releaseJun 2026Mar 2026
LanguageC#TypeScript
DockerNoNo
GPUNot neededNot needed
arm64 or Apple SiliconNot statedNot stated

dotnet-starter-kit

A modular .NET 10 monolith using vertical slices, Mediator CQRS, EF Core on PostgreSQL and Finbuckle multitenancy. It ships Identity, Billing, Files, Webhooks, Auditing, Chat and other modules, plus admin and tenant React 19 apps. The fsh CLI or dotnet new scaffolds the full source, and .NET Aspire starts the stack locally.

Who it is for: .NET teams building a multi-tenant SaaS who want owned source

Strengths

  • Full source scaffolded with project references, no hidden runtime NuGet packages
  • Multitenancy, JWT/Identity auth, billing, auditing and webhooks already wired in
  • 1,600+ backend tests and 200+ Playwright E2E tests, with NetArchTest boundary checks
  • Docker Compose and AWS Terraform deployment included

Weaknesses

  • No AI or LLM features described in the README
  • PostgreSQL only; other databases are not mentioned
  • Local stack needs .NET 10 SDK, Docker and Node 20+
  • Many modules to learn and trim before it fits a smaller product
  • C#
  • Needs PostgreSQL, Valkey, RustFS (S3-compatible storage), .NET 10 SDK, Docker, Node 20+
  • GitHub template

next-forge

next-forge is a Turborepo monorepo scaffolded with `npx next-forge@latest init`. It includes a marketing site, main app, API, docs, email templates and Storybook, with shared packages for Clerk auth, a typed database ORM, Stripe payments, Resend email, analytics, Sentry and Arcjet security. An AI utilities package is included, but it is one package among many.

Who it is for: Teams starting a Next.js SaaS who want an integrated monorepo stack

Strengths

  • Auth, payments, email, analytics, observability and security packages are pre-wired in one monorepo
  • Each app is independently deployable; packages are shared across apps
  • Live demos for web, app, Storybook and API health check
  • Docs include migration guides for swapping providers

Weaknesses

  • Default stack needs many third-party accounts: Clerk, Stripe, Resend, Sentry, Arcjet, PostHog
  • AI package is described only as 'AI integration utilities'; specifics not in README
  • Opinionated stack; replacing providers means following migration guides
  • Requires Node.js 20+ and Stripe CLI for local webhook testing
  • TypeScript
  • Needs Node.js 20+, Bun, Stripe CLI, Clerk, Stripe, Resend, Sentry, BetterStack, Arcjet, PostHog, Google Analytics
  • GitHub template

More in SaaS boilerplates

Building with these?

We help teams pick an open-source AI stack and run it in production. Client work never changes a rank.