dotnet-starter-kit vs ant-design-pro

Two of the top projects in SaaS boilerplates, side by side: who leads on each score part and who each one suits, then setup, license, activity and what each review found.

11st of 14 in SaaS boilerplates

dotnet-starter-kit

.NET 10 multi-tenant SaaS starter with two React 19 front-ends

#44th of 14 in SaaS boilerplates

ant-design-pro

React admin dashboard template built on Ant Design 6 and Umi Max

Verdict

dotnet-starter-kit ranks higher, 78 to 69. Of the 4 score parts we measure for both, dotnet-starter-kit leads on 1, ant-design-pro on 2 and 1 is even.

  • Adoptionant-design-pro leads by 62 points, 91 to 29: a wide gap.
  • FreshnessEven at 100.
  • MaintenanceWe do not score dotnet-starter-kit on this; ant-design-pro has 58.
  • Easy to rundotnet-starter-kit leads by 67 points, 100 to 33: a wide gap.
  • Agent-readyant-design-pro leads by 15 points, 85 to 70: a wide gap.

Pick dotnet-starter-kit if you are

.NET teams building a multi-tenant SaaS who want owned source

  • Full source scaffolded with project references, no hidden runtime NuGet packages
  • Multitenancy, JWT/Identity auth, billing, auditing and webhooks already wired in

Pick ant-design-pro if you are

React teams building enterprise admin UIs on Ant Design

  • Includes dashboard, form, list, profile, account and result page templates
  • Built-in i18n, mock development setup, and unit and e2e tests
dotnet-starter-kit vs ant-design-pro: score parts and facts
What we comparedotnet-starter-kitant-design-pro
Score parts, out of 100
Adoption29, niche91, widely used
Freshness100, active100, active
MaintenanceNot scored for this kind58, fair
Easy to run100, very easy33, some setup
Agent-ready70, partly85, ready
Facts from GitHub and the README
Stars6.8k38.9k
LicenseMIT (permissive)MIT (permissive)
Last commitSep 2026Oct 2026
Last releaseJun 2026Aug 2026
LanguageC#TypeScript
DockerNoNo
GPUNot neededNot needed
arm64 or Apple SiliconNot statedNot stated

dotnet-starter-kit

A modular .NET 10 monolith using vertical slices, Mediator CQRS, EF Core on PostgreSQL and Finbuckle multitenancy. It ships Identity, Billing, Files, Webhooks, Auditing, Chat and other modules, plus admin and tenant React 19 apps. The fsh CLI or dotnet new scaffolds the full source, and .NET Aspire starts the stack locally.

Who it is for: .NET teams building a multi-tenant SaaS who want owned source

Strengths

  • Full source scaffolded with project references, no hidden runtime NuGet packages
  • Multitenancy, JWT/Identity auth, billing, auditing and webhooks already wired in
  • 1,600+ backend tests and 200+ Playwright E2E tests, with NetArchTest boundary checks
  • Docker Compose and AWS Terraform deployment included

Weaknesses

  • No AI or LLM features described in the README
  • PostgreSQL only; other databases are not mentioned
  • Local stack needs .NET 10 SDK, Docker and Node 20+
  • Many modules to learn and trim before it fits a smaller product
  • C#
  • Needs PostgreSQL, Valkey, RustFS (S3-compatible storage), .NET 10 SDK, Docker, Node 20+
  • GitHub template

ant-design-pro

Ant Design Pro is a React 19 and TypeScript boilerplate for enterprise back-office apps, built on Umi Max 4 and antd 6. It ships ready-made pages for dashboards, forms, lists, profiles, account settings, login and error screens, plus i18n, mock data and unit and e2e tests. A built-in AI chatbot page uses Ant Design X, and an `npm run simple` script strips the template down to a minimal version.

Who it is for: React teams building enterprise admin UIs on Ant Design

Strengths

  • Includes dashboard, form, list, profile, account and result page templates
  • Built-in i18n, mock development setup, and unit and e2e tests
  • Ships Claude Code skills for upgrading the template and querying antd APIs
  • TypeScript with Tailwind CSS v4 and antd-style theming

Weaknesses

  • AI support is a single chatbot page; no model backend is described
  • `npm run simple` permanently deletes files and cannot be undone
  • Tied to the Umi Max and antd stack; no other frameworks
  • No Docker or compose setup mentioned in the README
  • TypeScript
  • GitHub template

More in SaaS boilerplates

Building with these?

We help teams pick an open-source AI stack and run it in production. Client work never changes a rank.