dyad vs llamacoder
Two of the top projects in App builder starters, side by side: who leads on each score part and who each one suits, then setup, license, activity and what each review found.
dyad
Desktop app that builds apps from prompts on your own machine
llamacoder
Open-source Claude Artifacts clone generating React apps with Llama
Verdict
dyad ranks higher, 64 to 44. Of the 5 score parts we measure for both, dyad leads on 4, llamacoder on none and 1 is even.
- Adoptiondyad leads by 11 points, 57 to 46.
- FreshnessEven at 100.
- Maintenancedyad leads by 52 points, 89 to 37: a wide gap.
- Easy to rundyad leads by 17 points, 17 to 0: a wide gap.
- Agent-readydyad leads by 15 points, 85 to 70: a wide gap.
Pick dyad if you are
Developers wanting a local Lovable/v0-style app builder with their own keys
- Runs locally as a desktop app, with no sign-up needed to download
- Bring your own API keys, so no hosted-platform lock-in
Pick llamacoder if you are
Developers building a prompt-to-app demo on open models
- In-browser preview via esbuild-wasm and esm.sh; no server sandbox cost
- Prisma and Postgres persistence for generated apps
| What we compare | dyad | llamacoder |
|---|---|---|
| Score parts, out of 100 | ||
| Adoption | 57, popular | 46, known |
| Freshness | 100, active | 100, active |
| Maintenance | 89, healthy | 37, patchy |
| Easy to run | 17, hard | 0, hard |
| Agent-ready | 85, ready | 70, partly |
| Facts from GitHub and the README | ||
| Stars | 21.9k | 7.1k |
| License | custom license (read the license) | MIT (permissive) |
| Last commit | Oct 2026 | Sep 2026 |
| Last release | Oct 2026 | None published |
| Language | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Docker | No | No |
| GPU | Not stated | Not needed |
| arm64 or Apple Silicon | Mentioned | Not stated |
dyad
Dyad is a local, open-source prompt-to-app builder, positioned as an alternative to Lovable, v0 and Bolt that runs on your own computer. It ships as a downloadable app for Mac and Windows and uses your own AI API keys, with no sign-up. Code outside src/pro is Apache 2.0; src/pro is under the Functional Source License 1.1.
Who it is for: Developers wanting a local Lovable/v0-style app builder with their own keys
Strengths
- Runs locally as a desktop app, with no sign-up needed to download
- Bring your own API keys, so no hosted-platform lock-in
- Mac and Windows builds available
- Code outside src/pro is Apache 2.0 licensed
Weaknesses
- src/pro is fair-source (FSL 1.1), not fully open-source
- README does not list supported models or providers
- No Linux build mentioned in the README
- Desktop only; no Docker or self-hosted web deployment mentioned
- TypeScript
- Needs Your own AI provider API keys
- env example file
llamacoder
Next.js App Router app with Tailwind that sends a prompt to Llama 3.1 405B on Together AI and renders the generated React app in a sandboxed iframe using esbuild-wasm and esm.sh. Needs TOGETHER_API_KEY, a Postgres DATABASE_URL via Prisma (Neon suggested) and S3 credentials for screenshot uploads; Braintrust tracing is optional. For developers building a prompt-to-app demo on open models.
Who it is for: Developers building a prompt-to-app demo on open models
Strengths
- In-browser preview via esbuild-wasm and esm.sh; no server sandbox cost
- Prisma and Postgres persistence for generated apps
- Braintrust observability wired as an optional env var
- Live deployment at llamacoder.io shows the finished product
Weaknesses
- Together AI only; no provider abstraction
- Screenshot upload requires five S3-related env vars
- No auth or rate limiting described
- No .env.example
- TypeScript, Together AI (Llama 3.1 405B)
- Needs Together AI API key, PostgreSQL (Neon), S3 bucket for screenshots, Braintrust (optional)
More in App builder starters
Building with these?
We help teams pick an open-source AI stack and run it in production. Client work never changes a rank.