appwrite vs supabase

Two of the top projects in Backends and databases, side by side: who leads on each score part and who each one suits, then setup, license, activity and what each review found.

11st of 9 in Backends and databases

appwrite

Self-hostable backend with auth, databases, storage, functions, messaging and hosting

22nd of 9 in Backends and databases

supabase

Postgres backend with auth, storage, realtime and edge functions

73 out of 100

Verdict

appwrite ranks higher, 93 to 73. Of the 5 score parts we measure for both, appwrite leads on 2, supabase on 2 and 1 is even.

  • Adoptionsupabase leads by 11 points, 97 to 86.
  • FreshnessEven at 100.
  • Maintenanceappwrite leads by 19 points, 91 to 72: a wide gap.
  • Easy to runappwrite leads by 67 points, 100 to 33: a wide gap.
  • Agent-readysupabase leads by 15 points, 85 to 70: a wide gap.

Pick appwrite if you are

Developers who want a self-hosted or managed backend for web and mobile apps

  • One Docker-based installer sets up the full stack, with Compose and env files also published
  • SDKs for 6 client and 10 server platforms, plus REST, GraphQL and Realtime APIs

Pick supabase if you are

Developers needing a Postgres backend with auth, storage and vectors

  • Built on Postgres, PostgREST, GoTrue and Realtime, so the data layer is plain SQL
  • Official clients for JavaScript/TypeScript, Flutter, Swift and Python
appwrite vs supabase: score parts and facts
What we compareappwritesupabase
Score parts, out of 100
Adoption86, widely used97, widely used
Freshness100, active100, active
Maintenance91, healthy72, fair
Easy to run100, very easy33, some setup
Agent-ready70, partly85, ready
Facts from GitHub and the README
Stars57.7k111.6k
LicenseBSD-3-Clause (permissive)Apache-2.0 (permissive)
Last commitOct 2026Oct 2026
Last releaseOct 2026Aug 2026
LanguageTypeScriptTypeScript
DockerYesYes
GPUNot neededNot needed
arm64 or Apple SiliconMentionedNot stated

appwrite

Appwrite is a backend platform that bundles Auth, Databases, Storage, Functions, Sites, Messaging, Realtime and a Firewall behind REST, GraphQL and WebSocket APIs. It runs as a managed cloud or self-hosted via a Docker installer, and offers a hosted MCP server so coding agents can operate on a live project. Client and server SDKs cover Web, Flutter, Apple, Android, React Native, Unity, Node.js, Python, PHP, Go, Rust and others.

Who it is for: Developers who want a self-hosted or managed backend for web and mobile apps

Strengths

  • One Docker-based installer sets up the full stack, with Compose and env files also published
  • SDKs for 6 client and 10 server platforms, plus REST, GraphQL and Realtime APIs
  • Hosted MCP server uses OAuth, so no API keys are needed on Cloud
  • Same product runs on managed Cloud or on your own infrastructure

Weaknesses

  • Installer needs access to the Docker socket on the host
  • Self-hosted instances must use a separate local MCP server, not the hosted one
  • Hybrid monolith-plus-workers architecture means many services to operate
  • RAM and CPU requirements are not stated in the README
  • no GPU
  • Docker + Compose
  • Needs Docker
  • port 20080

supabase

Supabase bundles a Postgres database with generated REST and GraphQL APIs, JWT-based auth, S3-backed file storage, realtime change feeds over websockets, and edge functions. It also includes a vector and embeddings toolkit for AI workloads. It runs as a hosted platform, can be self-hosted, or run locally, and has official clients for JavaScript, Flutter, Swift and Python.

Who it is for: Developers needing a Postgres backend with auth, storage and vectors

Strengths

  • Built on Postgres, PostgREST, GoTrue and Realtime, so the data layer is plain SQL
  • Official clients for JavaScript/TypeScript, Flutter, Swift and Python
  • Hosted, self-hosted and local development options
  • Apache-2.0 license; vector and embeddings toolkit included

Weaknesses

  • Many separate services to run when self-hosting; README gives no resource requirements
  • Go, Java, Rust, Ruby and C# clients are community-maintained, some partial
  • Repo has no Docker or compose files; self-hosting is documented elsewhere
  • no GPU
  • Compose
  • Needs PostgreSQL, S3-compatible storage, Envoy

More in Backends and databases

Building with these?

We help teams pick an open-source AI stack and run it in production. Client work never changes a rank.